Council chiefs: Bath's green belt is as safe as houses
Council chiefs have promised that they will not allow green belt land around Bath to be used for housebuilding.
The new coalition Government will allow local authorities to determine the number of new homes needed in their areas – ending a system where targets were imposed from above.
-
Now the leader of Bath and North East Somerset Council has confirmed that the new regime lifts any threat to land around Newton St Loe and at Odd Down and South Stoke.
Energetic campaigns had been fought in both areas over suggestions in a B&NES blueprint that they might be suitable for "urban extensions".
But council leader Councillor Francine Haeberling says such plans are now "dead in the water".
In a letter to the Chronicle, she said the council would now be reviewing the figures – based on demands from the previous Labour Government – in its Core Strategy Spatial Options document.
She said targets set by the previous Government, which had wanted to see 21,300 new homes built in B&NES in the next two decades, had been "unsustainable, based on no real logic or evidence, and would have meant building on swathes of green belt land".
"New proposals will be brought forward which are based upon real evidence of local need and economic growth. We have already confirmed that, given the fact we have had a recession since the Labour Government's original figures were announced, the high levels of building previously proposed are not deliverable or desirable."
Her ruling Tory administration says that it should be possible to cater for Bath's future housing needs without encroaching on to greenfield sites.
New Communities Secretary Eric Pickles scrapped the previous Government's housing demands within days of entering Whitehall but Mrs Haeberling's pledge is the first detailed statement on the issue.
City MP Don Foster, who had described the old Government's targets as "barking mad", said a balance had to be struck. "We do need a significant increase in affordable housing but there can be no justification for building on greenfield sites. We have a real opportunity now to do our own planning."
A spokeswoman for the NSL Conservation group, set up to fight the suggestion in the Core Strategy that 2,000 homes might be accommodated on Duchy of Cornwall land around Newton St Loe, welcomed Mrs Haeberling's move.
"We have always questioned the housing numbers and proposed that brownfield sites should be prioritised for development. This statement means that B&NES is ready to consider the views of local residents and protect green fields and farmlands – a really positive step forward in local planning and decision-making."
Chair of South Stoke Parish Council, Mark Dunningham, said: "We welcome the fact that this should safeguard the green belt around Bath from future development for at least the period to 2026."
But Mike Grist, director of business development at Bath-based social landlord Somer Housing, said that with nearly 7,000 people on the B&NES accommodation waiting list, the need for more new homes was greater than ever.
He said: "Access to an affordable home remains a serious problem for many people in Bath and north east Somerset despite house prices having fallen from their peak in 2007."
He said research had suggested that 850 new affordable homes were needed every year in B&NES over and above those for sale on the open market.
Letters, page 52











29 Comments
View all
by roger hillier, bath
Thursday, April 21 2011, 2:12AM
“the homeless and people wanting to be housed have always been a problem here in bath yes its a beautiful city, world heritage status etc.we are as you might say a victim of our own success story. i think if you plaster the whole place in new housing estates we will soon become a place that people from all over the world might not be so keen to come and visit.nobody these days seem to shout out the very real importance of preserving a very famous city, to my mind people are just coming here in there droves and expecting to be housed unless you know different.finally i would like just to say all planning applications seem to point yet another much needed supermarket with lots and lots of new jobs being created, isn't it boring lets take the new tesco application a huge development with money pouring into it from twerton weston oldfield park ,unlike its predecessor pitman press ,not an export in sight same old local money sloshing around the economy, lets give an urgent look and favourable planning to those who will invent and export [just like we used to here in bath]and pour some real money back into our economy”
by Victoria, Bath
Wednesday, June 23 2010, 11:07PM
“If there were, say, triple council tax payable on second homes then quite a lot more of central Bath might be lived in by Bathonians, who in turn would free space in the city for first-time buyers. But I suppose that would have to be set by central government and even New Labour fought shy of this issue.”
by Viscount Vixley, Bath
Monday, June 21 2010, 11:59PM
“Once again Madge you have hit the nail on the head! I will not defend my background, my children, and my less than glowing finances to the biased and unchangeable views of a few commenters who clearly think I'm a dreamer with illusions of Green Belt grandeur! Our point is made and to be honest, I think we came off better Madge!”
by Madge Yewer, Bath
Monday, June 21 2010, 10:17PM
“Which of course brings us straight back to the urban extension for 2000 houses on the Green Belt around Bath. 35% of these were to be for affordable units, mostly for rent, and some for shared ownership, all of which would have remained as affordable houses forever as Council houses used to be. That's 700 affordable houses, more than have been provided in Bath for the last 20 years.”
by Viscount Vixley, Bath
Monday, June 21 2010, 2:06PM
“Thomas...Would these be my lofty ideals of striving to have a roof over my childrens heads for longer than 6 months at a time?? To allow them the unwarranted privilege of being able to attend the same school for longer than 2 terms in any one year? Some of us want it all don't we??
How exactly is one supposed to save to buy a home when despite not having the luxury of holidays and cars, ones rent is higher than ones income?? Do you truly believe that what has to give when money's so short are societies poorest? Try the bankers, idle rich and tory politicians! I couldn't agree more that the very worst thing for most of us was Thatchers policy of selling off our council houses.”