Tiny cycle path plan
A cycle path that could be the shortest in Bath is to be created in Bath city centre.
The route will allow cyclists to cross from Monmouth Street to Kingsmead Square across the pavement, and will be close to another short route allowing them to cross from Westgate Street to Monmouth Street.
B&NES Council's cabinet has approved the plans, which mean cyclists would be able to ride across the pedestrian area between Pizza Hut and Boston Tea Party.
But Conservative opposition councillors have expressed safety fears.
Shadow cabinet member for transport Councillor Tim Warren (Con, Mendip) said: "This is a really busy pedestrian area at all times of day, and having cyclists cross right through the middle could prove dangerous. We don't think these plans have been properly thought through at all by the council.
"Even if a designated cycle path is painted on the pavement, when the area is busy many pedestrians still won't see this and will be startled by cyclists crossing their path.
"This is particularly the case for elderly people and the blind and partially sighted. They will not expect to have cyclists crossing such a pedestrianised area."
The opposition has called for signs asking cyclists to dismount to be put up.







57 Comments
View all
by airhellair
Friday, February 03 2012, 10:22AM
“Currently yes. It's a quicker option than walk/train/train/bus/walk. The bus gets delayed due to roadworks. There's more than a 10 min wait between trains.
The present cold weather is playing havoc with my nostrils. I find it uncomfortable to ride with a face mask. While it's cold, I'm going to try walking a third of the distance, a bus, train then walk again. It may not be quicker, but might be warmer.
All london's public transport carry folding bikes. Some accept full-size bikes. More at:http://tinyurl.com/yfs6lsp”
by Mr_Nemo
Thursday, February 02 2012, 8:10PM
“"Do you use a bicycle as your main daily transport Anil?"
Probably not unless TfL allow him to take it on the tube !”
by mcupis
Thursday, February 02 2012, 4:11PM
“Do you use a bicycle as your main daily transport Anil?”
by airhellair
Thursday, February 02 2012, 1:07PM
“Bicycles are simply irrelevant to their daily lives."
In my experience, only to those who are overweight, lazy or tend to walk 2 metres from home to car then car to somewhere else.”
by geoffone1
Thursday, February 02 2012, 12:26PM
“I think we already have good evidence on how dangerous an idea this is seeing as there is an identical "tiny cycle path" about 5 metres away. There is another a further 100 metres away by Queens Square. Both of these are on busy pavements. Has anyone died or been seriously injured while using that one?
The point the anti cyclist lobby miss is that if a cyclist hits a pedestrian they will almost certainly fall off and injure themselves possibly much WORSE than the pedestrian. This provides strong incentive not to hit them.”
by NigelSh
Thursday, February 02 2012, 11:25AM
“I would like to just reiterate that the statistics I quoted were also official DfT figures, quoted in Hansard and thus also not "something cobbled together over a lentil stew by a tiny group of beardy yoghurt knitting fundamentalists."
I'm taking the liberty of assuming that Parliament was not being described thus in this instance.”
by rogerh3
Thursday, February 02 2012, 10:55AM
“2% is the national average for journeys taken. If you check the 2006 Joint Local Transport Plan you'll find significantly higher figures, e.g. up to 11% for commuting in inner Bristol. In any case, you build infrastructure to support your objectives and, like it or not (and the majority like it), encouraging cycling is both a national and local objective.”
by t1mmyb
Thursday, February 02 2012, 10:23AM
“The Times has launched a "Cities Fit for Cycling" campaign:
http://tinyurl.com/7gtaefh
One of its manifesto points is "Two per cent of the Highways Agency budget should be earmarked for next generation cycle routes, providing £100 million a year towards world-class cycling infrastructure. Each year cities should be graded on the quality of cycling provision."
Malcolm, as you're fond of reminding us, we're "only 2%". Surely 2% of the Highways Agency budget (and local highway authority, too, I would argue) is only fair and equitable then? Because that would be a *massive* leap from the paltry amount that is spent at the moment, and could make a real difference to the safety, quality and completeness of cycling infrastructure, if it's spent well and best practice from the Netherlands is followed.”
by t1mmyb
Thursday, February 02 2012, 9:55AM
“Cycling will solve a host of urban problems. In order to achieve mass cycling, you design for the many who would cycle (but who find it too intimidating currently) over (but not ignoring) the hardy 2% who cycle already.”
by mcupis
Thursday, February 02 2012, 9:28AM
“No Vikingx, official Department of Transport statistic. Not something cobbled together over a lentil stew by a tiny group of beardy yoghurt knitting fundamentalists.”