Row over lift plan for Bath Spa station

Trusted article source icon
Tuesday, January 06, 2009
Profile image for This is Bath

This is Bath

Rail campaigners are calling for a crucial element of a £10 million revamp of Bath Spa Railway Station to be scrapped.

Protest group More Train Less Strain (MTLS) is claiming passengers could be put at risk of a serious accident if plans to remove a ramp at the station go ahead.

The group has launched an official campaign to save the ramp access to the station which developers are intending to replace with an internal lift.

The work at the station is part of Multi's £360 million SouthGate retail and residential scheme which will open in three phases between autumn this year and autumn next year.

Multi's plans for the station involve scrapping the ramp, creating a wider pedestrian area at the front of the station and turning ancient vaults in the bowels of the building into a series of food and drink outlets and public amenities.

Planning permission and listed building consent for the entire scheme was granted between 2002 and 2003 but vital changes have had to be made to plans for a passenger lift to replace the ramp at the railway station.

Plans were submitted and permission granted for a new lift but regulations on disabled access have changed over the past five years and the initial proposed lift is also smaller than Network Rail's new standard size.

Multi has had to resubmit an application for listed building consent after increasing the size and changing the location of the lift in its original proposal.

The firm will not need to re-apply for full planning permission for the new 16-person lift because it is an internal structure.

But MTLS says it is concerned for passenger safety if the work goes ahead as planned.

Spokesman for the group Tony Ambrose said: "We are concerned for passenger safety.

"We are concerned that the majority of people that use the station are ordinary people on foot and by removing the ramp you are talking about squeezing a quart into a pint pot.

"You only need one person to fall on the stairs and with 100 people trying to get down the stairs behind them and you have the makings of a very serious accident.

"We will start a city-wide lobby campaign to get travellers to email, phone and write to the people concerned.

"Someone must take responsibility and review what is a poor decision to remove the ramp."

Frank Tompson, chairman of the Two Tunnels group which is developing a cycle route to the south of Bath, is also calling on developers to urgently reconsider the reinstatement of the ramp on health and safety grounds.

Mr Tompson said removing the ramp and replacing it with a single lift would have a negative impact on access for cyclists, disabled access, people pulling luggage and motorists dropping off disabled passengers.

He said: "Only one small lift is planned to handle the requirements.

"It will cope at slow times but never at peak times, and no back-up will be in place."

Multi has decided to increase the capacity of the lift in line with an updated code of practice on accessible train and station design for disabled people from the Department for Transport.

It will be large enough to transport one wheelchair user and allow a wheelchair to be rotated inside the lift car.

The revised proposals would also see the removal of a modern door and the restoration of a historic window which can be seen from the main approach to the station's southern entrance.

But pressure group Campaign for Better Transport spokesman David Redgewell said: "We support the transport interchange and we always have done.

"The interchange needs to go ahead for the benefit of the regeneration of Bath."

Multi's development manager Jon Munce confirmed the location of the new lift was to fit in with updated guidelines and practical construction issues.

He said: "As the station is Grade II listed even these very minor changes must be covered in a revised listed building application.

"We are satisfied that the capacity of the lifts will be sufficient to cope with demand."

B&NES Council is due to determine the application for listed building consent at a meeting on Tuesday February 17.

3
Tweet this article
Report

3 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by bob, Bath

    Friday, January 09 2009, 5:51PM

    “I think the point that has passed people by is that the station currently has NO lifts...

    It can not be acceptable under DDA or other legslation to require wheel chair bound people to take their chances on the ramp which is shared by cars and taxis. The current situation is far from DDA compliant and presents a real danger.

    I have looked at the new plans for the station as well. The scheme clearly shows that there will be new lifts installed on both the north side of the station and the southside, there will also be a secondary lift on the north side in the event of a malfunction or maintenance requirements I assume......

    The proposed scheme would be a vast improvement, is this a case of the people of Bath not wanting change or improvement yet again!!!!”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by Thomas, Bath

    Wednesday, January 07 2009, 9:59AM

    “This plan is fundamentally flawed and could endanger life if it goes ahead. As a disabled person, I cannot move very quickly, even though I am not in a wheelchair, and rely on being dropped at the top of the ramp to avoid the crush on the stairs. Cyclists, wheelchair users, people with rolling luggage and mums with pushchairs all need to access the platform and a lift is not the answer. This is a classic example of fixing something that ain't broke! WHAT HAPPENS IN THE EVENT OF A POWER CUT OR A FIRE??? It is a strict no-no to use a lift in a fire situation, so how exactly would they evacuate the platform? And how would the emergence services access the area to deal with any accidents? If there is a power cut will they offer to carry people down the stairs? If they have money to burn I would suggest a long-overdue revamp of the platforms and facilities rather than taking away an invaluable asset.”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by PW, Bath

    Wednesday, January 07 2009, 9:20AM

    “Isn't this why there are health and safety regulators? I know that so-called experts sometimes get it wrong, but have more faith in them than the protest group who seem to live to do exactly that. Better to spend time protesting about the existing problems like dirty/late/expensive trains than hypothetical overcrowding problems no?”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters