Protest against bedroom tax takes to the streets of Bath
Dozens of protesters gathered outside the Guildhall in Bath this afternoon to express their opposition to the so-called bedroom tax.
Changes to housing benefit legislation due to come into effect from next month will mean people living in social housing who are deemed to have too much living space having their payments cut.
-

Today's protest over bedroom tax in Bath
The Bath Bedroom Tax protest was organised by local residents Vicky Drew, Kath O'Connor and Sam Baldwin, and coincided with more than 30 others taking place around the country.
Around 75 people turned up to add their support to the campaign, holding up banners and signs and shouting slogans against the new legislation.
Limited Deal. All day wedding photography only £545.00
View details
All day wedding photography only £545.00
From Bridal preparations to first dance.
250+ Hi Res images on disc with full printing rights.
Professional photography at affordable prices.
Terms:
Free no obligation consultations.
Offer subject to availability.
Book before 31st May 2013.
Email:carmelo@bellafoto.co.uk
Available in Bath, Bristol and surrounding areas.
Contact: 01225 439257
Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013
Ms Drew said: “The Department for Work and Pensions itself has admitted that 31 per cent of social housing tenants will be affected, two thirds of whom will have a disabled family member living in the property.
“People are living in fear and dread of this cruel policy".
Tracy Marsden from Bath said she was now worried for the future and would have to drastically reduce her already tight budget in a bid to make ends meet.
“I have just lost some hours at work and claim a little housing benefit but now on top of that I am going to have to pay out more.
"I will have no money left.
“That is why I am here – what can I do? What am I supposed to do?”
Other protesters, who didn’t want to be named, said there was a shortage of smaller homes to move into and that, even if they could downsize, the process was far from simple as they would have to bid for properties, which could take months.
They also said they lacked the funds to cover moving costs.
Denise Stainer from Combe Down moved into her two-bedroom home in 2004 after it was allocated by Somer Housing, now Curo.
The 41-year-old, who is a wheelchair user and in constant pain from fibromyalgia and disc damage, now says she faces a stark choice – food or rent.
She said: “When you have a chronic pain condition, you have to keep the place warm and my gas and electric bills are already £110 a month and I can’t pay any more.
“I was offered that house because at the time they had a different system, you were allocated a property and you took what you were given but now the system has changed and you have to bid for properties.
“Adaptations have been made to my house (to help her get around easily) and I am worried; I wouldn’t like to have to move, I have made friends and joined the church and have a garden for my dog.
“It is the longest I have ever lived in a place, I had a very unsettled childhood and moved around a lot.
“David Cameron doesn’t understand living on a budget because most of the Government are rich and worth millions and don’t have to worry about the cost of things.”
The protest was also attended by a number of private householders who won’t be affected by the move but still wanted to protest at what they believe is an unfair tax.
Brian Green and his eight-year-old son Joseph, from Bear Flat, braved the rain to add their support.
Mr Green said: “It is a tax on vulnerable people and I think it is despicable, it won’t work and will cost more to administer than it saves.”
Opponents also took the protest to the streets of Bath, heading past the abbey down to SouthGate before heading up Stall and Union streets to Queen Square.
Under the changes people will be assessed for the amount of bedrooms they need and can either make up the rent themselves or move into smaller accommodation.
The Government has already announced some changes to the new legislation after protests, with foster carers and families of those in the armed forces now exempt.
Pensioners are also exempt, while families with severely disabled children can also claim exemption if their children cannot share a room.
The new rules allow one bedroom for each adult or couple.
Children under the age of 16 are expected to share, if they are the same gender. Those aged under ten are expected to share whatever their gender.




75 Comments
View all
by DayOfTue
Thursday, March 21 2013, 1:51PM
“by Linksers, "One side of the coin has the QUEENS head on it. How many spare bedrooms has she got i wonder?"
Not only that but a word of advice for immigrants (who have been coming to this cosmopolitan
country for milleniae). Just change your name to "Windsor" and you'll be welcome!
(Sax-Coburg wasn't it? Perhaps some future monarch might wear a veil and be nee Elizabeth Bin-Laden hehe)”
by DayOfTue
Thursday, March 21 2013, 1:20PM
“As well as not facilitating repairs, why not delay all payment until the last minute? Make the system take us to court individually for this blood money. A judge might not be so cruel and might not always agree with penalising people. They might decide to uphold the old start of letters from the old DHSS which began (words to the effect of) "the government has decided the amount you
will get to live on". NOT "the government has decided the amount you will get to live on - less £20".
The legal definition for a boxroom was 50'sq. It may be illegal for a council to make no discretion between this and a bedroom. (Current building regs insist upon larger).
Who knows what might happen in court - always worth a chance eh?”
by DayOfTue
Thursday, March 21 2013, 12:13PM
“Death, Divorce, MOVING. The three greatest stresses causing mental illness and suicide. Cheaper than the odd spare room? Kill us and free up a whole house?
Not a Christian attitude methinks. More like the politics of a morally bancrupt government with its brown shirt followers.”
by DayOfTue
Thursday, March 21 2013, 12:07PM
“It looks like more housing benefit goes to private landlords than the public sector - what cuts are made there?
How much does the administration cost out of this?
We afforded £700bn to bail out banks. We can afford numerous wars/occupations. Who with a heart can suggest that that the people in this country who are below the breadline are not paying
enough or taking too much?”
by DayOfTue
Thursday, March 21 2013, 11:57AM
“When I asked Banes how many on the list for 1 bedroom properties I was told 34.
The number on the list for them was over 7000!
Someone was moved into a 1 bedroom accom. in my street just 2 weeks before I was told move or find £21/week out of benefit. If I had this property it would have freed up this bedroom for 'taxpayer' use. So it is not maximising bedroom space that looks priority, is it?”
by DayOfTue
Thursday, March 21 2013, 11:51AM
“Con foster - Robbing the Poor to Pay Shareholders More”
by LINSKERS
Thursday, March 21 2013, 9:26AM
“Spurious indeed;Council house building started in earnest about 1945;has taken 68 years to introduce this vile bedroom tax.”
by MoeXXX
Wednesday, March 20 2013, 11:07PM
“Yes, they will receive smaller handout from the taxpayer on the entirely spurious reason that they have an extra room.
Maybe people who own more cars than they need should also receive a smaller handout from the taxpayer - perhaps by banning them from taxpayer-funded motorways, thereby freeing up the motorways for those that really need them? Makes exactly as much sense, though somehow I expect Malcolm will fail to see the analogy.”
by LINSKERS
Wednesday, March 20 2013, 7:19PM
“mcupis It is only severely disabled children who are exempt not disabled adults so there could be deaths ......so hopefully the Goverment will be charged with something like Corporate manslaughter.”
by LINSKERS
Wednesday, March 20 2013, 7:19PM
“mcupis It is only severely disabled children who are exempt not disabled adults so there could be deaths ......so hopefully the Goverment will be charged with something like Corporate manslaughter.”