New skywalk vision for The Rec unveiled by city pressure group
An eye-catching vision of what a new 20,000-capacity stadium at The Rec might look like has been unveiled by an influential group of rugby fans.
The Real Friends of The Rec pressure group has teamed up with a postgraduate architecture student to produce a design aimed at stimulating debate over what might be possible if Bath Rugby decides to develop a new arena at its historic home.
Architecture and engineering experts in Bath helped 28-year-old Jonathan Crossley to finetune his vision, which incorporates a dramatic rooftop walk and aims to open up new views of the city.
The images have been seen by the rugby club’s new owner Bruce Craig and its chief executive Nick Blofeld as well as by senior politicians, business leaders, residents’ groups and other sporting bodies.
The 4,700-strong Real Friends group wants the rugby club to stay at The Rec, and to develop a stadium which could be used for a variety of other sports.
The club is currently weighing up whether The Rec or two sites at opposite ends of the Western Riverside offer the best potential for the 21st century playing facilities it so badly needs.
Real Friends chairman Peter Downey said any new stadium should offer a “21st century heritage” legacy and said Mr Crossley’s rooftop - dubbed The Rec Skyline Walk - would become a “must-do experience” for visitors.
“The skywalk scheme will, we hope, get everyone talking about the possibilities that imaginative, world-class architecture can open up.
“No one has seriously disputed that having Bath Rugby in the centre of Bath brings enormous economic benefits to the area. The absolute genius of this concept is that it creates an iconic visitor experience, that is quite separate from the rugby, attracting more visitors and opening up new views of the city and the surrounding hills.
“The Rec Skyline Walk could become a must-do experience to set alongside the Thermae rooftop pool, and the Roman Baths. I doubt anyone would want to leave Bath without walking along this 21st century parade.”
University of Bath student Mr Crossley’s concept has been tested and mentored by Bath-based firms DKA Architects and Buro Happold, the engineering consultancy behind buildings such as the O2 arena and Arsenal’s Emirates ground
Mr Downey said the reaction to the images had been very positive.
“There’s a great will to keep Bath Rugby at the Rec, and these plans were conceived as part of that effort. We hope that this imaginative concept and all that it envisages continues to act as a catalyst in securing a future for the Rec.
“We have always seen our responsibility as being supportive to Bath Rugby, while exploring every avenue through which the city can benefit from their continued presence on the Rec. We hope the skywalk scheme will get everyone talking about the possibilities that imaginative, world-class architecture can open up.”
The new rooftop walk would sweep upwards from a new access onto Johnstone Street, while shops and cafes could be integrated into the riverside edge of the stadium. Lifts would allow disabled access to the roof.
The three-sided design allows for seasonal changes on one side, allowing different uses of The Rec throughout the year.
Mr Crossley said: “The problem over the use of Rec is one of devaluation in that whatever you might seek to implement, you are deemed to be taking away from the rest of the Rec. Given that the underlying principles of the Rec are that any commercial use of it does not seek to undermine or devalue the continued recreational use of the Rec by the people of Bath, a solution was sought that allowed for both the Rugby and the Rec to prosper.
“As such the overarching gesture of the building is to establish an extruded landscape that facilitates the continued use of the Rec for Rugby yet also offers back a new promenade to the city.”
He has been careful to ensure sightlines of Bath Abbey are preserved from around the city while working on his five-month project.
Mr Downey said the student from Burnley’s vision “blew him away” when he first saw it.
Mr Blofeld welcomed the Real Friends group’s move.
“We think it is a great initiative and very creative, and it is going to take a creative solution such as this to find the right home for the club and keep us in the heart of the city long term.
“Jonathan’s work, supported by experienced architects and engineers, progresses the thinking for what might be achievable at The Rec, and may well spark other even better ideas.
“The club continues to work hard on determining where we believe the best site would be and also explore design ideas that would work best for both the club and the city. It is a complex challenge as we all know, but I really think we are making progress with great support from the council and local community.
“Being under new ownership has also provided a fresh perspective and even more determination to solve the problem as soon as we can.”
Deputy leader of Bath and North East Somerset Council Councillor Malcolm Hanney said the authority welcomed the “enthusiasm, imagination and obvious potential” shown by Mr Crossley.
But he added: “While Bath Rugby are in the process of determining their preferred approach (including possible locations for a new stadium) we do not believe it is appropriate to comment on specific proposals that may be put forward by other parties.
“We continue to do everything we can to work closely with Bath Rugby to help them achieve their ambitious plans for the club.”
Bath Preservation Trust chief executive Caroline Kay has seen the vision and its architecture and planning committee will be getting a fuller briefing next week.
She said: “Only at that briefing will we get a full understanding of how the design solution is derived from the context, and whether or not important vistas are retained. These plans are of course a completely kite-flying exercise, since the future location of the rugby club is not determined and this design is not put forward by them.
“However, as a vehicle for provoking debate about what is or is not achievable on The Rec, I am sure it will manage to do so, not merely in terms of the rugby club but also in terms of the place that highly engineered contemporary design might or might not have in Bath.
“This is a worthwhile debate though I cannot at this point prejudge the answers.”
B&NES Council opposition leader Councillor Paul Crossley said the Real Friends vision was a "fabulous concept".
"The issue now is to see if the rugby club wants to make it work."








9 Comments
by Sulis, Bath
Thursday, June 03 2010, 9:22PM
“The advantage you get is a large green space in the middle of the city instead of more buildings. Like any other charity, though, it has to pay its way - unlike public parks and gardens which can be maintained out of Council funds.”
by Matt, Bath
Thursday, June 03 2010, 7:26PM
“Quick point, this charitable status covenant is a load of bunkum!!! Bath residents have to pay to use the Rec, just like anyone else! We get no advantage as a resident! The Rec is being run by the council as a commercial venture. As such I don't really value this charitable status covenant - it isn't being adhered to currently, it shouldn't have an influence over the grand scheme of the future location of Bath Rugby.”
by Sulis, Bath
Thursday, June 03 2010, 7:05PM
“The issue is neither the design of the stadium nor the opposition of 'friends' or any other residents. The real issues are the charitable status of the Rec and the covenants dictating its use. Even in the unlikely event of a sufficiently large stadium being permitted there's no possibility at all of the shops and other commercial activities necessary to make one viable being built there.”
by Jay, Bath
Thursday, June 03 2010, 1:04PM
“Quite right Matt. Fantastic though those plans are - and great for the City, Bath Rugby has been penalised for too long by vested interests. It's time to move on. Let them play lacrosse and and hurling in front of their Skywalk. I'll be watching the rugby at a purpose built facility a mile away.”
by JC, Bath
Thursday, June 03 2010, 1:00PM
“At first glance, the plans definitely look interesting.Western Riverside may be a better location, but I do worry what will happen to the Rec. if the rugby leaves. If it can be well-used, then fine, but if it becomes a bit of a pointless eyesore, then developing it does make sense.
Matt - Don't bother with the Fiends, just read their long, boring, rambling letters next week and you will see what Bath is up against.”
by Matt, Bath
Thursday, June 03 2010, 12:19PM
“Provoking debate is a good thing. We need critical thinkers who are going to evaluate and analyse all realistic options. And, crucially, the decisions need to be made by those people. Bath Rugby has a new owner and a relatively new CEO, hopefully they will be approaching this situation with as much impartiality as they can.
RFOTR and FOTR have their agendas, but I would really like to see members from each camp critically evaluate their own standpoint. It's then that we might get a unified consensus on what is best for Bath Rugby and best for the city.
I used to resent the 'Not In My Back Yard' (NIMBY) approach of the local residents and was incredulous that they would jeopardise the future of Bath Rugby for the preservation of their treasured view of the abbey from their ivory towers. As such I took the view that Bath Rugby ought to remain at the Rec almost to spite them.
However, I have since started to think that we should leave these Victor Meldrews to their petit squabbles and start a fresh with a new stadium at the Riverside Development. It¿s just such a shame that regeneration plans for that waste ground have been on the table for what seems like 15 years and the council have dragged their incompetent heels for this long!
The last point for consideration is that the Rec is absolutely not public access and is not at all set aside for the recreational use by the people of Bath. It¿s a nice myth that we have this wonderful green space available to us but try kicking a ball about on there before the ¿parky¿ clocks off! He¿ll saunter over and want to know your booking details, if you¿ve not booked and paid you¿ll be slung off! Stealth corporate use in action!”
by Roger Snelgar, Combe Down
Thursday, June 03 2010, 10:53AM
“I cannot understand how a new Stand to replace the existing one is going to get 20. 000 into the Ground. How many is it expected to hold ?
The real problem is any idea of building a Stand on the opposite of the Pitch. This would be the eyesore”
by Lucy, MSN
Thursday, June 03 2010, 10:30AM
“Is Alexandra Park part of the skyline walk?
The council *really* needs to cut back a lot of the foilage there....”
by Jim, Bath
Thursday, June 03 2010, 8:41AM
“If the aim is to stimulate debate...job done.
Methinks Jonathan is being used as a patsy.
The key stakeholders know where the new stadium will be built, so just get on with it for the benefit of the fans and the town.
P.S Bath has a "must - do " skyline walk .Others can judge how it compares with this proposal.”