Hugh Dixon: Less is still more in the digital switchover
Is Bath about to become a city of haves and have-nots? From some of the grumblings about the forthcoming switchover to digital telly you might think we were.
It's all down to Bath's hilly geography and the position of the two transmitters that serve us.
Ten miles south of the city, cresting the Mendip Hills, towers the "mighty" Mendip Transmitter, a colossus of guyed steel tubing, at 305 metres (that's 1,001 feet in real money) the 15th tallest structure in the UK.
A couple of miles to the east of us is the Mendip Mast's stubbier relative, sometimes referred to as the Bathampton Transmitter but officially known as just Bath. And unless you're one of the lucky few Bathonians with a clear line of sight to the Mendip transmitter, Bath is where your TV signal comes from.
In its previous incarnation, Dixon Towers was served by the punier of the two towers. We got the two main BBC channels, Channel 4, and ITV1. If you stood on your head in the loft with a transistor radio clamped to your ear you could just about pick up Classic FM. Not that you'd necessarily have wanted to. There was no Channel 5, let alone any of the digital channels. And that's the way it still is today.
When we moved to the west of the city our viewing horizons opened up. Even before we bought a digital box, there was Channel 5 (although we've never watched it). With the box we got price-drop tv (the ghastly fascination of watching other people max out their credit cards soon wanes). And there was digital radio (or a disturbing bubbling sound, depending on the phase of the moon). TV and radio heaven.
What didn't change when we moved, though, was the amount we had to pay for our TV licence. And because of that we felt rather chuffed: whether or not we watched them, we did get a whole load of extra channels for no extra money.
(We also got a phone call from the new proprietors of Dixon Towers East asking why their telly wasn't working properly. But they'd moved from Bristol and didn't understand...)
So let's go back to the question about Bath's haves and have-nots.
If we still lived in Dixon Towers East, we'd be rather looking forward to the digital switchover. From March 24 we'd be getting good digital reception on eight channels, in place of the current dodgy analogue signal on four.
And a couple of weeks after that, on April 7, we'd be getting an extra 10 channels, including BBC3, BBC4 and limitless re-runs of Tinky Winky on CBBC. Without spending anything extra on the TV licence.
Yet some people seem to think they're being hard done by, and even that they deserve a licence rebate because they're not getting a full set of channels. Are they right? Or are they just moaners?
Tune in next Thursday for the final gripping instalment.











10 Comments
View all
by Dave, Larkhall
Wednesday, March 17 2010, 8:24PM
“Hysterical loop was what I probably jumped through when I predicted back in the sixties that transistors and computers would never catch on. I did so love those cathodes, grids and anodes.
Oh well! We all make mistakes in life I suppose.”
by Bill W, Timsbury, Bath
Wednesday, March 17 2010, 8:11PM
“Dave, I think the birth control mechanism is the " hysterical loop ".
" `omes law " is a cockney spin-off of the famous american series (I think).”
by Dave, Larkhall
Wednesday, March 17 2010, 12:52PM
“Far from boring Bill, I found it very enlightening. I gave up a career in electronics when I discovered ohms law had nothing to do with house purchase, and a hysteresis loop was not a birth control device.
Thanks for the sound advice, but was only joking about my lounge lights. Still using three candles and an old oil lamp.”
by Bill W, Timsbury,Bath
Wednesday, March 17 2010, 10:47AM
“250 watts is the E.R.P. (effective radiated power) in the U.H.F. (ultra high frequency ) band from the Bathampton repeater station.
I have equipment that can broadcast close to the same freqencies, and with it I can use 20 watts of power and reach as far as the Weymouth amatuer repeater.
A portable handheld P.M.R. radio transmitter has a range of 5 kilometers (3 miles) and only has 0.5 watt output.
The electromagnetic radiation from a Radio / TV transmitter reduces at the inverse of the square of the distance from it.
Think of it as a light bulb, from all angles the light is the same brightness. But as you walk away from it the amount of light cast on the ground reduces very quickly as the pool of light gets ever larger. Radio waves are like light, they are out of the range of frequencies that our eyes can detect.
So, to provide the power to cover a few miles for the Bath area, 250 watts is more than enough. (unless you are in the shadows of of hills etc.)
I hope that clarifies why the huge difference in power is needed for the main area transmitters such as Mendip or Wenvoe.
By the way low energy bulbs use about 15% of the 250 watts you use to light your lounge. You could save 85% of the 10.5p + it costs you every 4 hours. (250w x 4 =1 kw hour).
See, I said it would be boring didn`t I?”
by Dave, Larkhall
Tuesday, March 16 2010, 5:39PM
“Did you not mean 250,000 watts Bill? 250 watts would only just light up my lounge lamps.”