Gull cull by city firm

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, July 23, 2009
Profile image for This is Bath

This is Bath

A cash and carry in Bath which was swamped by seagulls has employed a private pest control contractor to kill them.

Booker in Bellotts Road said it took action after residents had complained about the nuisance gulls and amid concern about hygiene issues.

A spokeswoman for the firm said the majority of the birds driven out by the contractor were resettled but when a few returned they had to be culled.

She said: "Following feedback from local residents regarding nuisance seagulls and to maintain the highest standards of hygiene, Booker had a responsibility to deal with this significant issue.

"Booker employed a professional pest control contractor which resettled the majority of the gulls. However, a few came back which had to be culled."

The firm declined to say how the birds were culled.

Council chiefs in Bath have always said a more general cull would be unworkable - and could even put the authority foul of the law.

Bath and North East Somerset Council has used a number of techniques to tackle the airborne pests, such as coating eggs with mineral oil to stop chicks hatching, replacing eggs with plastic ones and flying a plastic hawk over rooftops during the breeding season.

The RSPB, which has now succeeded in getting herring gulls placed on the red list of creatures considered to be endangered or vulnerable, says councils such as B&NES should not be using legislation aimed at dealing with health hazards to tackle gulls, which the pressure group says are simply a nuisance.

Organisations are however allowed to take action against gulls under a section of law which is aimed at protecting people from health and safety hazards.

Referring to the Booker incident, a spokesman for the RSPB said: "The RSPB expects that the store in question, and any private contractors, have fully considered the situation and trialled non-lethal deterrents as a means of dealing with the issue before deciding on lethal control.

"However, we accept that, if non-lethal measures have been tried and found not to work, then the current legislation (Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981) does allow landowners and other authorised persons to carry out lethal control on certain species, including herring gull, for certain reasons, including to preserve public health and safety.

"We assume that the store can demonstrate that lethal control of the gulls in question is necessary in order to preserve public health and safety because obviously the law does not permit control for reasons of noise or nuisance."

Cllr Steve Hedges (Lib Dem, Odd Down), who sits on the council's gull working group, said he was surprised and concerned that Booker had taken this action.

He said: "I am concerned that what they have done will show that this is okay - and what message will that give to the general public?

"It is a problem which the Government needs to look at with a bit more urgency."

Many of the problems caused by the birds relate to their attacks on bags of waste and the council is now planning a pilot scheme involving gull-proof hessian sacks in parts of the city centre.

17
Tweet this article
Report

17 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by Kirsten, Bath

    Sunday, July 26 2009, 11:08AM

    “There is a method of deterring gulls which involves stretching nylon wires across the streets. You don't need a lot - just enough to make it difficult for them to swoop down and up. It does not injure them, simply bothers them to the extent that they leave. Once the gulls have gone you can remove the wires. I did pass this idea on to Cllr Hedges, having been told by an American visitor how successful it was there, but nothing seems to have come of it.

    There is another cause of the gulls being here. Incredible as it may seem, there are some deluded people out there who go to the trouble of feeding them regularly. I was in town one evening and saw the gulls all hanging around the High Street. It soon became evident why, as a little old man came down armed with bags and bags of bread to feed them. They were clearly expecting him. This sort of behaviour should attract a penalty as it now does in Bristol - up to £2500.”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by Val, Bath

    Sunday, July 26 2009, 9:31AM

    “I salute Bookers, well done, its about time someone from this town took a stand as we are over run by this aerial nuisance. I saw a guy step outside Greggs the Bakers, open his purchase to eat, then swoop, down came a Gull within an inch of his face for yet another free meal, a passer by commented " You nearly lost that one" It's about time B&NES took a leaf out of Bookers, book and rid the City of Bath of attacks, filth and terrible screeching”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by Trevor, Bear Flat

    Saturday, July 25 2009, 8:17PM

    “MESSAGE RECEIVED LOUD AND CLEAR CLLR HEDGES. A week after the Chronicle highlighted that the seagull population in Bath doubled between 2001 and 2007 the Chronicle reports Councillor Steve Hedges (Lid Dem ¿ member of the council working group) as wondering what message will the culling (by Booker) of some gulls in the Bellotts Rd area sends to the general public. I think the main message for the general public is that this private company is more in tune with public opinion than some (perhaps all) of our council members and that if Cllr Hedges is representative of the gull working group then it is no wonder that gull numbers are escalating out of control.
    If Cllr Hedges thinks culling these pests is a bad thing then maybe he can stand on a pro-gull ticket at the next council election ¿ the electorate will undoubtedly send him a very clear message”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by JM, Bath

    Saturday, July 25 2009, 12:58PM

    “Looking at the alliterative headline, you have to hope they never do a piece on breeding mallards!”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by Robert, Bath

    Friday, July 24 2009, 1:51PM

    “I think the factories and warehouses by the tow path at Brassmill Lane could learn from Bookers.

    I get fed walking along the tow path and getting divebombed by the wretched gulls. I've also been sat in the beer garden at The Dolphin pub and seen people (including young children) being attacked. The horrible creatures even swoop down on people sat at the tables in the beer garden.”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by Pete, Gull Central (Lower Bristol Road)

    Friday, July 24 2009, 12:51PM

    “Brilliant post, Matt, I totally agree with you.

    The RSPB say that the gulls should not be removed merely because they are deemed 'a nuisance'. Oh, so we should continue to put up with their deafening racket 18 hours per day, and be dive-bombed by them, and simply do nothing?

    And our ordinary garden birds seem to disappear each summer when the gulls are around. Does the RSPB think gulls need more protection than smaller birds?


    If the only grounds for lawfully removing them are 'health and safety', well, I'd say that the sleep deprivation caused by being woken at 4 am every morning is very much a health issue.
    I loved the claim that Cllr Steve Hedges sits on the Council's 'gull working group - what an oxymoron, because their strategies
    are not working; 'egg-oiling' and flying a plastic falcon over the city centre are woefully inadequate. Considering how many gulls there are screeching and squawking all day in Bath city centre and the immediate environs, why on earth does the Council believe that its measures are having any effect?

    Incidentally, we keep being told that it is illegal to kill gulls (or any other birds) because of the 1981 Countryside and Wildlife Act. The urban gull problem did not exist 28 years ago when this law was enacted, so it needs to be amended.

    In the meantime, Cllr Hedges, don'y try and blame the Government for the Gull problem. Useless though the Government is, the remedy is in BANES Council''s hands. Do what Bookers have done, and get a private company in to remove the gulls (only a few of them were kiled, it seems, so this seemed a relatively humane method, for those who seem weirdly concerned about the awful gulls' welfare).

    I just don't think our Council has the courage to deal with this problem properly.

    Well done to Bookers, both for listening to residents' concerns, and for actually doing something about the gull problem. If only our pathetic Council would do the same,”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by Robert, Bath

    Friday, July 24 2009, 12:11PM

    “Kim - don't forget that the council are causing the litter problem by making people put their bin bags out by 7am, which means most people put the bags out the night before. Rich pickings for the foxes, cats and even hedgehogs. And at 4am the gulls wake up with their screaching and they then start on the bin bags.”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by Matt, Bath

    Thursday, July 23 2009, 7:01PM

    “Congratulations to Cllr Steve Hedges who really has hit the nail on the head - "I am concerned that what they have done will show that this is okay - and what message will that give to the general public?" I can tell you councillor - it tells this particular member of the general public that there is somebody out there who has assessed a problem called in a registered authority to deal with it, within the law, and has done it in a timely manner. This is of course something that the council has failed to grasp over an ever increasing muber of years and watched rather lamely as the problem exacerbates. Oh and of course it's the government's fault - no it isn't as both Bookers and the RSPB agree that it was legal. Go on - get some spine and deal with it as that is what you are there to do, i.e. what the elctorate want if you had forgotten. I wonder if the management team at Booker's fancy running this council for a while - we might actually make some progress in the city?”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by Dave, Weston

    Thursday, July 23 2009, 4:14PM

    “So they "resettled" the birds and culled the ones that came back? So where exactly did they resettle them - are we talking Weston Super Mare or Homebase here. Anyway seems like the solution to the problem is to chase all the gulls (back?) to Bookers and let them deal with them!”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by Kim, Bath

    Thursday, July 23 2009, 3:26PM

    “Gulls, pigeons, rats, foxes etc. have become scavengers and I believe that's down to us humans. We leave food waste and rubbish everywhere so it's hardly surprising these creatures no longer feel the need to hunt and forage when we provide everything they could want and more. To be honest they often do a good job of tidying up or streets on a Friday and Saturday night when the pubs and clubs kick out and the takeaways get busy. I know this doesn't relate to Bookers but I can't help thinking it us that needs to take more of the blame sometimes rather than use culling as the quick answer...”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters