End of the road for eyesore Destructor Bridge in Bath

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, December 13, 2012
Profile image for Bath Chronicle

Bath Chronicle

An unsightly road bridge is to be replaced on the River Avon in Bath.

Plans are about to be submitted to replace the Destructor Bridge as part of another phase of the Western Riverside development.

  1. The Destructor Bridge is set to be replaced  PICTURE: Lloyd Ellington

    The Destructor Bridge is set to be replaced PICTURE: Lloyd Ellington

At the moment the bridge, which links Upper and Lower Bristol roads, is one-way and has a weight restriction.

However, as a condition of the Western Riverside development and thanks to a recent funding boost for the city, the new bridge will be able to take two-way traffic, with vehicles routed through the development to reach Lower Bristol Road.

Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk

myprint-247

View details

Print voucher

Our heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.

Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk

Contact: 01858 468192

Valid until: Wednesday, May 22 2013

The bridge dates back to the 1870s and was moved from Green Park in the early 20th century, taking its name from a nearby incinerator.

The £2 million for the rebuild came from a pot of £13 million given to the city by the West of England Local Enterprise Partnership. The rest of the money will go towards the dismantling of the final gas holder, a flood compensation solution for the city and the building of a new footbridge.

Developer Crest Nicholson Regeneration will be submitting a detailed planning application to Bath and North East Somerset Council for the new bridge soon, along with plans for a block of 55 apartments adjacent to the bridge.

The one and two-bedroom apartments, due to be run by Curo, will be affordable and are being funded by the Homes and Community Agency. There will also be a commercial element to the building on the ground floor, with a possibility that a doctors' surgery in some or all of the space.

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for Mr_Nemo

    by Mr_Nemo

    Monday, March 04 2013, 12:56PM

    “Some years ago the 'Slip' bridge at St Helens in Swansea was taken out of use. The span was lifted off in one piece and placed on the ground in a nearby park area. After refurbishment, it now forms part of a footpath/cyclepath route along the shoreline.

    Surely something similar can be done with the Destructor bridge? With the bridge at ground level it has only to support its own weight, so limited structural repairs would be necessary, and the result would be the preservation of one more part of Bath's industrial city. Why do the various 'authorities' in Bath seem so lacking in initiative???”

  • Profile image for Ilovespaniels

    by Ilovespaniels

    Monday, March 04 2013, 11:35AM

    “Latest news on the Destructor Bridge http://tinyurl.com/bn9xnu7

  • Profile image for Mr_Nemo

    by Mr_Nemo

    Monday, December 24 2012, 1:40PM

    “"Traffic on Lower Bristol Road is heavy so that Midland Road traffic from the bridge forms a long tailback which will become worse once the bridge and the road are widened......"

    As a regaulr user of Midland Road, I will admit that there have been a few occasions when there has been a long wait to exit onto the LBR, but that is usually only when the LBR itself has a problem further east causing long-tail backs. Usually it is not bad and drivers on the LBR seem to be quite good about letting people out.

    I do not see how widening Midland Road and the bridge will make the problem any worse. There will be traffic going north that does not at the moment, perhaps giving more problems at the junction with the UPPER Bristol Road, but I don't see why there will be more traffic heading south UNLESS of course they do not impose a weight/height limit on the new bridge.”

  • Profile image for MadAsHeck

    by MadAsHeck

    Monday, December 24 2012, 11:40AM

    “The Destructor Bridge is on the Midland Road and does not have a natural intersection with Lower Bristol Road. Traffic on Lower Bristol Road is heavy so that Midland Road traffic from the bridge forms a long tailback which will become worse once the bridge and the road are widened. A round about is needed but there is no room for it. The Lower Bristol Road is pinched at the junction with Midland Road. There is no point to increase capacity because the pinch will reduce capacity to the point where no one will use it. In other words, a waste of money. Leave the bridge as is.”

  • Profile image for Mr_Nemo

    by Mr_Nemo

    Sunday, December 16 2012, 4:38PM

    “Actually, Pompeybelle, I would have expected nothing less from you !

    I agree too with tomsjan - Midland Road is NOT a rat-run, but an essential part of the cross-river traffic system. Look at the number of people who ignore the 'No Entry' and come across it the wrong way. Without it we would merely add even more to the congestion on the Windsor Bridge and around Pinesgate.”

  • Profile image for aurea_flamma

    by aurea_flamma

    Sunday, December 16 2012, 1:55PM

    “Oh come on rip it down and be done with it – and while you're at it clean and tile the unkempt Roman Baths, swap stone and lead for glass and stainless, put a suspended ceiling in the Abbey to improve the carbon footprint of keeping the void heated, and bulldoze the Guildhall into Parade Gardens to create a bus and coach park, remove the unsightly step out of the River Avon at Poultney bridge, and widen that bridge for modern traffic – it will be progress!

    Industrial heritage is just like other heritage once you lose it – it's too late to ever get it back!”

  • Profile image for Pompeybelle

    by Pompeybelle

    Sunday, December 16 2012, 11:41AM

    “@ Mr Nemo - Forgot to say - it probably won't surprise you to know that I did know about the other bridge! Again - it could be used imaginatively. Re-use is nearly always better than demolition. (I keep saying that but the council's planning committee seems to have stuffed its fingers in its collective ears - with one or two noble exceptions.)”

  • Profile image for jonquil

    by jonquil

    Saturday, December 15 2012, 9:08PM

    “They will probably replace it with some creation of tubed metal like the new bus station in the name of design.I think it's not the bridge that is ugly it's the surrounding area.”

  • Profile image for Pompeybelle

    by Pompeybelle

    Saturday, December 15 2012, 1:21PM

    “The gasometer that was supposed to be preserved, or at least demolished carefully and stored for rebuilding on elsewhere such as an industrial museum, because it was one of the oldest existing on the country and quite decorative, was demolished in haste in 2009 - no planning permission had been granted and even English Heritage were surprised at the haste, though they had not listed it. However, they had thought it should be recorded. Not only that, it was chopped up with a cutting torch, thus preventing any of this heritage nonsense.

    I feel rather sad about it, as it was by far the most attractive of the gasometers, and Mr Pompeybelle had taken some gorgeous pictures of it at sunset. I admit, as I think I've said before, that even as a child, I have always rather liked gasometers so perhaps I am a bit biassed.”

  • Profile image for rogerh3

    by rogerh3

    Saturday, December 15 2012, 10:23AM

    “The gasometer isn't listed.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article