BREAKING NEWS
 

Car park charging plan dropped by Bath and North East Somerset Council

Trusted article source icon
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Profile image for Bath Chronicle

Bath Chronicle

Plans to charge in small free car parks in communities across the Bath area have been dropped after a backlash from traders and politicians.

Liberal Democrat-run Bath and North East Somerset Council had been considering bringing in charges at nine car parks across the district in a move which would have generated £300,000 a year.

  1. Oriel Hall car park

    Oriel Hall car park

But the authority’s consultation process over its budget plans have revealed widespread opposition to the idea, and it now says free parking will be kept in Batheaston, Chew Magna, Midsomer Norton, Paulton, Peasedown St John, Radstock, Saltford, Timsbury, and Wellow.

It has also now reviewed the situation in Larkhall, where its charging plans unleashed a volley of criticism from shopkeepers and local councillors, and decided not to charge there, at a site in East Twerton, and at two small sites in Keynsham.

Limited Deal. All day wedding photography only £545.00

Bellafoto Photography

View details

Print voucher

All day wedding photography only £545.00
From Bridal preparations to first dance.
250+ Hi Res images on disc with full printing rights.
Professional photography at affordable prices.

Terms: Free no obligation consultations.
Offer subject to availability.
Book before 31st May 2013.
Email:carmelo@bellafoto.co.uk
Available in Bath, Bristol and surrounding areas.

Contact: 01225 439257

Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013

The decision was made after budget fairs which gave local people and organisations the chance to provide feedback on the council’s plans to balance its books against the background of the most swingeing funding cuts since the war.

Councillor Roger Symonds (Lib Dem, Combe Down), its cabinet member for transport, said: “We are a listening council and the messages that the cabinet heard about abolishing free parking in many car parks were very clear. Proposals for charging in Batheaston, Chew Magna, Midsomer Norton, Paulton, Peasedown St. John, Radstock, Saltford, Timsbury, and Wellow will not form part of the cabinet’s budget recommendation to council in February 2013.”

It stressed that proposals to raise extra income through parking charges in Royal Victoria Park would be unaffacted.

Larkhall councillor Dave Laming (Ind, Lambridge) said he had persuaded Mr Symonds of the damage parking charges would do to local traders.

“We need to work together to keep shops going,” he said.

Conservative councillors had also strongly criticised the car park charging plan.

Conservative Shadow Cabinet Member for Resources, Councilor Charles Gerrish (Con, Keynsham North), said:

“This has to be one of the fastest U-turns in the council’s history so far, but the fact the Lib Dems have bowed to public pressure will come as great relief to local residents and traders.

“However, this has left the council’s budget plans in disarray and will result in a financial black hole to fill."

People can still take part in the consultation at www.bathnes.gov.uk/budgetview or by writing to Resources Team, 3rd Floor, Guildhall, Bath, BA1 5AW.

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for BrookWhelan

    by BrookWhelan

    Wednesday, November 21 2012, 9:38PM

    “It will be interesting to know how the council are going to find the £300,000 that this measure would have raised. Most of the cupboards are already bare as it is.”

  • Profile image for MajorFlack

    by MajorFlack

    Wednesday, November 21 2012, 8:41AM

    “Motorists should be prepared to pay the cost of their pollution rather than expect the taxpayer to pick up the bill.

    They are and already do.

    Parking charges are something different - here probably linked to a local authority's opportunism in attempting to replace funding losses having pledged to remove revenue-building traffic.”

  • Profile image for jezer

    by jezer

    Tuesday, November 20 2012, 11:23PM

    “I can't believe the council's u-turn on this. Motorists should be prepared to pay the cost of their pollution rather than expect the taxpayer to pick up the bill.”

  • Profile image for tomsjan

    by tomsjan

    Tuesday, November 20 2012, 4:25PM

    “How has Moorland Road escaped the parking charge brigade for so long? Although I am not a fan of pay parking as a rule, it is impossible to park down there even with a blue badge so maybe charging would help the turnover of spaces and encourage more enforcement. When there is not even space on the yellow lines it is time to act surely?”

  • Profile image for Dave_Weston

    by Dave_Weston

    Tuesday, November 20 2012, 4:17PM

    “Which is entirely correct Timmy - where there is space to put in those safe cycle lanes which in a place of narrow streets like Bath requires some imagination and maybe alternative viewpoints. I've suggested before that if buses aren't going to contribute to the solution maybe taking out the London Road bus lane and using the space to create a kerb protected cycle lane either side might encourage more people to cycle on one of the main flat routes into/from Bath centre. There seems little point using bus lanes to make buses more reliable and therefore attractive if First is just going to restrict capacity to maximise profits - why not try something new!”

  • Profile image for Big_Matt_H

    by Big_Matt_H

    Tuesday, November 20 2012, 4:06PM

    “Brook - do you really think anyone would suggest parking charges as a way to fund 'major transport schemes'?

    In an ideal world, Councils would invest in public transport and safe walking and cycling routes before introducing parking charges. Yet - regardless of the current financial climate - councils are limited on how they can raise funds and what they can spend them on.

    However, this does not change the basic premise that parking charges are a good way of making our high streets more successful and boosting the local economy.”

  • Profile image for t1mmyb

    by t1mmyb

    Tuesday, November 20 2012, 3:40PM

    “Spot on, Dave_Weston.

    Don't forget "providing for cycling in a way that people *feel* safe" for motor traffic reduction, too. There are some short, local trips that could be made by bike that are currently driven, but (apart from the "keen" cyclists) people would rather ride away from motor traffic.”

  • Profile image for Viscount_V

    by Viscount_V

    Tuesday, November 20 2012, 3:34PM

    “Very true Dave Weston, nationalisation or true competition. it's either/or in my book. We have neither in the West Country in particular and with the cost of living here so high it's grossly unfair to ensure nearly all modes of transport are unaffordable to the majority of people who live and work here.”

  • Profile image for Dave_Weston

    by Dave_Weston

    Tuesday, November 20 2012, 3:18PM

    “Trouble is, we keep coming back to the same situation - without any real means to manage buses into an attractive proposition, councils are left with the sole option of making driving so unattractive that the buses look less unattractive. However that is to some extent chasing its own tail - the economics of running buses means that putting another bus on the peak runs which is going to make no money off peak isn't profitable so its better to push back against increased demand by raising fares (thereby increasing revenue with no additional cost).

    So what happens in practice is driving becomes more expensive/difficult and at the same time getting the bus gets more expensive with the net result that little transfer actually happens, and people just end up worse off and unhappy with traffic being as bad as ever.

    Until some form of regulation of buses occurs (which needn't be full nationalisation - you could have regulated fares and private operators bidding to run services either for a premium, for free or for a subsidy) a lot of the rest is shifting the deckchairs on the Titanic. Its hard to see after years of effort what has actually been acheived in terms of reducing congestion, other than diverting some trade to other places.

    Getting a better balance of car vs other means of transport is undoubtedly the right thing to be looking for - at the moment though we aren't acheiving.”

  • Profile image for Big_Matt_H

    by Big_Matt_H

    Tuesday, November 20 2012, 3:18PM

    “I'm against all transport monopolies. State or otherwise. South Yorkshire is leading the way on driving down fares with a variety of operators involved.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article