Bid to review rapid bus scheme thrown out

Trusted article source icon
Friday, November 21, 2008
Profile image for This is Bath

This is Bath

Politicians last night voted to plough on with a controversial £60 million drive to tackle congestion in Bath.

Opposition Liberal Democrats had attempted to put the brakes on the Bath Transport Package, which includes the £16 million Bus Rapid Transit project.

At a stormy meeting, they accused the council's ruling Tory cabinet of turning a deaf ear to concerns over the scheme, which would create a new segregated bus route in Newbridge.

Residents opposed to the BRT, which they say will be an environmentally-damaging waste of money, protested before a meeting of Bath and North East Somerset Council last night.

But Conservatives, Labour and independent councillors teamed up to vote down a move by the Liberal Democrats to get an independent review of the plans.

Instead, the council voted simply to "engage with residents" and crack on with the package, which also includes contentious plans for a new park and ride site at Bathampton.

The Response2Route pressure group, buoyed by a poll on the Chronicle's website www.thisisbath.co.uk showing 80 per cent opposition to the BRT, also handed over a 2,000-signature petition to B&NES last night.

During the council meeting, an overspill room had to be opened to accommodate the protesters.

The growing divide between the biggest parties at the Guildhall over the BRT intensified last night amid claim and counter-claim about exactly how the route had been first approved.

Tories accuse the opposition of going back on initial support for the principle of the BRT, which appeared as a line on a map in a planning blueprint to which all parties signed up two years ago.

The Liberal Democrats say the plan has changed since then, and that walkers and cyclists would be marginalised by the latest scheme.

The cabinet has warned that any changes to the package would risk the city losing around £50 million of Government funding to sort out Bath's traffic nightmares.

Deputy council leader Cllr Malcolm Hanney said that if Bath's transport issues were not addressed, the city's economic growth could be stifled.

Tories say plans for the BRT route have already been reviewed by independent experts who concluded that creating a segregated section on a former railway line which is now a popular recreation area would be more cost-effective than using existing roads.

Conservative politician Cllr Richard Maybury (Lambridge) said: "After years of increasing congestion, these plans are a big step forward in keeping Bath moving. The new and expanded park and rides will take thousands of extra cars off Bath's roads and the improved bus routes will benefit thousands of transport users across the region. It's just a shame that cross-party support for this scheme has broken down."

Party colleague Cllr Colin Barrett (Con, Weston) added: "Attempts by Liberal Democrats to put the brakes on these improvements would be a one-way route to gridlock. The plans for the rapid transit route have been detailed since before I was a councillor, yet the Liberal Democrats now want to backtrack on their previous support at massive cost to taxpayers."

The BRT would run from an expanded Newbridge Park and Ride site through the Western Riverside and the city centre to the new facility at Bathampton.

The package also includes expanding sites at Odd Down and Lansdown and improving existing bus services.

Opposition councillor Andrew Furse (Lib Dem, Kingsmead), who led the move to get the BRT route reviewed, accused Tories of "quibbling".

"We are still not convinced that all the alternatives have been properly looked at and that there has been real and meaningful consultation. Once again the Conservatives have shut their ears to the protests which have been raised by the very people who will be worst affected by the scheme.

"The Conservatives seem only to be concerned with quibbling about who voted for what and when in the past. But residents care more about what is on the table right now. It is clear that the other parties do not care about residents' concerns."

Cllr Caroline Roberts (Lib Dem, Newbridge), who represents people most affected by the route, said the BRT and the expansion of Newbridge Park and Ride would affect up to 1,000 people's homes in one way or another.

"It has been said by some people that there is a lot of fuss over the loss of just a half a dozen gardens. In fact we have counted the numbers and there are up to 1,000 residents who will be affected by the new road outside their houses, or the new extension to the Newbridge Park and Ride.

"The present situation is different in many ways to that agreed in the local transport plan, so the Tories should listen to the electorate and agree to an independent review to show the people that they are listening."

Protesters fighting the scheme say it will become a magnet for anti-social behaviour.

At the protest outside the Guildhall, campaigner Jo McCarron said: "We are here to protest againt the BRT because we feel that we haven't been given any facts that the BRT will do what they say it will.

"We have not seen any evidence of cost benefits or a feasibility study.

"This scheme threatens Newbridge and Lower Weston as a residential area,and it will also deliver very limited benefits at a huge cost.

"There are major feasibility issues and financial risk which have not been properly assessed.

"The council have decided in favour of the scheme before even completing an impact assessment.

"At night the roadway will become a magnet for mopeds, joyriders and anti-social behaviour which the council will not be able to control.

"We just wanted to be out here to show the amount of people who are upset about this.

"The council need to listen to us and they are not."

Sue Greco, 62, of Newbridge Road, said: "My garden is right at the bottom of where they propose to put the bus lane.

"I don't want the noise or the pollution that will come with this.

"I think this route will be open to vandalism – it will become dangerous.

"I am definitely against this – we have used the lane to walk the dogs and take our grandchildren out. I have lived here for 35 years.

"My house will be de-valued because of this and they do not care.

"The council need to listen to us about this but they don't and won't."

Pippa Page, 49, from Newbridge, who was at the demonstration with her husband Robert, said: "It is a green belt area and is special because of its outstanding beauty.

"A normal person living in Newbridge wouldn't be able to put up a loft extension because the council would have a problem with it but yet they seem to be able to do as they please."

34
Tweet this article
Report

34 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by Steve, PSJ

    Monday, November 24 2008, 12:30PM

    “Swap traffic light controlled junctions for large roundabouts.

    Make all bus lanes available to cars with 2+ people.

    Scrap the Bus Gate, it is causing congestion elsewhere by forcing traffic to take longer journeys, still within the city.

    Start planning for a viable Ring Road to enable existing through traffic to completely bypass the City.

    Change the Park & Ride payment, from Per bus passenger, to per car parked. Presently there is no economical incentive for cars with 3-4 pasengers to use park & ride. Also if you are doing serious shopping, you would need to go back & ffrth several times to drop thing at your car. Alternatively, if you needed to buy a single item from visiting 1 shop, then again it is not economical to use P&R.

    Task all Bath Employers to provide Annual Park & Ride Passes for their employees. If you used the money being spent on BRT to subsidise this, it would be more viable & effective.

    Lastly, to nothing is not an option, but to spend millions doing the wrong thing, which will make vitually no difference IS WORSE than doing nothing!”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by HS, Bath

    Saturday, November 22 2008, 4:46PM

    “Vernon - well said! I've also suggested something along the lines of subsidised/free public transport and school buses. Council reaction - zippo!

    By the way does anyone know how much the new bus fare will be?”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by Vernon Herridge, Baytree Road

    Saturday, November 22 2008, 12:26PM

    “No doubt some study has been conducted into the numbers of people working in Bath who live on current bus routes, yet choose to drive. If the millions promised by the Government were used to subsidise fares ( say 50 pence per journey as a standard fare) and to provide reliable bus services using existing routes, how long would that money last? People could catch a bus near their home and not need to drive to the Park and Ride. And the environment would be saved to see another day. Encouraging people to use pushbikes would be useful and healthy too, though it is never safe to leave a bike in town without fear of it being stolen or vandalised.”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by al, bath

    Saturday, November 22 2008, 10:19AM

    “heres a plan, dont vote for them at next opportunity. Im sure this will be long before anything is actually done. Mind you i dont fancy your chances of who you are voting for doing anything different.
    Ease cobgestion caused by school run?? Solution... dont make school start 10 minutes before most people have to be at work making a car the only option for us normal people to get to work in time.
    Mind you at least when this BRT is built it will take a couple of cars off the road meaning i will be one or two car lengths closer to getting to work on time.”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by Julia, Bath

    Saturday, November 22 2008, 6:42AM

    “I heard a while ago that First was considering a flat £1 per journey fare anywhere in Bath for a three month trial period to make fares cheap and simple like in some European cities. I guess they hoped to make up revenue with greater utilisation. I think it sounded a great idea. I would certainly use the bus under those terms. Of course it never happened.”

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article