Transport schemes in melting pot

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Profile image for This is Bath

This is Bath

A controversial £57.5 million transport package for Bath is in the melting pot after Transport Secretary Lord Adonis called a public inquiry into a council attempt to grab land for the schemes.

The inquiry, which will look at the four sets of compulsory purchase orders issued over land needed for the Bath Transportation Package, will take place some time between mid-March and mid-May.

Opponents of the schemes which are part of the package have taken heart from the announcement - which will push any final agreement on Government funding beyond the next general election.

The 59 parcels of land relate to sites needed for expanding the Newbridge Park and Ride site, lengthening a bus lane in London Road, creating a stretch of bus lane in Lower Bristol Road, and the creation of the hotly-debated Bus Rapid Transit in Newbridge.

In October one set of Government officials decided that an inquiry was not needed into the two most contentious aspects of Bath and North East Somerset Council’s package – a new park-and-ride site at Bathampton and the new BRT route along a former railway line at Newbridge.

But because the 160 objections received over the CPOs include some from statutory objectors - people directly affected - a separate inquiry into whether the land should be taken will now be held.

The council has initial approval for the Government funding which will pay for the vast majority of the package - but still needs what is called full business case approval from the Department for Transport.

Analysts are expecting expenditure on transport to be one of the losers in the squeeze on public spending over the next few years - whatever party is in power after the election which is likely to be held on May 6.

The council said that as far as it is concerned, everything was still going to plan.

A spokesman said: "This inquiry was entirely expected by the council. Bath and North East Somerset Council has always programmed into the Bath Transportation Package timetable a suitable length of time for a public inquiry related to the confirmation of a CPO.

"Upon the receipt on even one statutory objection, the Secretary of State must hold a public inquiry under Government legislation unless all parties (i.e. the objectors) agree an inquiry is unnecessary.

"The council must consider the objections that have been submitted. Negotiations continue with landowners to reduce the need for compulsory purchase. The timing and duration of the CPO inquiry will depend on these considerations. The timescales for the public inquiry indicated by the Department for Transport are earlier than the council anticipated. The Bath Transportation Package project proceeds as planned."

City MP Don Foster, who supports the Bathampton scheme but is opposed to the choice of route for the BRT, said the chickens were coming home to roost for the council.

“Right from the outset I have argued that more research was needed into these proposals. 

“When I spoke at a council meeting in September 2008, I expressed my concerns that this project had been tackled the wrong way round, and that consultation with residents had been far from adequate.

“However, the council refused to listen to my concerns and is now faced with the real possibility of losing almost £60 million.”

Professor Christine Harland of the University of Bath's School of Management said she did not know the detail of the scheme but added: "It appears likely that irrespective of which party is elected that there will be substantial cuts to public spending announced immediately.

"Even in those areas of public spending where departmental expenditure limits are not substantially reduced in total, efficiency savings will be targeted. Each proposed project will be scrutinised more closely and will have to provide far more evidence of value for money.

"Calling for an inquiry in this particular situation is not unusual and is likely to relate to the number of complaints received, not necessarily anything more sinister. "However, the longer projects remain unapproved, the more likely it is that they will not be funded or funding will be reduced because the story is not going to get better, only worse for another year."

Bjorn Arnils, who would lose part of the garden of the home in Ashley Avenue he shares with his partner Nadine Geary, said he hoped a new government of whatever political hue would look at the situation in a different way.

“It seems to be a complete waste of more than £50 million and apart from that it is going to take my garden away.”

Local councillors Loraine Morgan-Brinkhurst and Caroline Roberts (Lib Dem, Newbridge) said they were delighted with the calling of the inquiry, which will be presided over by an independent inspector.

Ms Morgan-Brinkhurst said: “There are over 1,000 residents affected by this who have all campaigned against it and at long last everything we have been saying has been listened to.

“Residents have worked extremely hard and we feel now we have got the option to put forward our case that this shouldn’t go ahead and there are other options. We think impartiality is really important.”

Bath Preservation Trust chief executive Caroline Kay said she hoped the CPO inquiry could also test whether Bathampton Meadows was the best site for an east-of-Bath park and ride scheme.

But spokesman for the South West Transport Network, David Redgewell, said he did not think the delay caused by the inquiry would jeopardise the plans, which aim to combat congestion throughout the city. He said he regarded the money as already allocated.

And he said of the BRT: “If it had been going through the countryside or beautiful open spaces or green belt land there would be some real issues but this goes through a disused railway line.

“It is not a beautiful oasis. I have sympathy for people with their gardens but it is not a place of beauty. We are talking about brambles and weeds. I’m pretty confident about the whole situation.”

A Department for Transport spokesman said: "We will have to wait for the outcome of the public inquiry before any decision can be taken on full approval of the Bath Transport Package."

It had originally asked the council to have all its paperwork in order by March to receive full business case approval before the election.

86
Tweet this article
Report

86 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by MFPA, Peasedown

    Sunday, December 27 2009, 11:28AM

    “Am I the only one who cannot understand why they want a bus link between three locations that are all adjacent to a railway line?”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by Kirsten, Bath

    Wednesday, December 23 2009, 11:51AM

    “When I first started to fight the proposals for the station - which are part of the Dorchester Street changes - and said that public safety was being sacrificed to commercial greed, I was shouted down on the grounds that I was being alarmist. Will people now agree that - given I was trained to look at systems, and could see that the proposed system was rubbish, and given that, as Moe says, there has already been an accident - I wasn't being alarmist at all. I was simply right. That's all the changes at the station are about - commercial greed - certainly not for the benefit of passengers.”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by Moe, Bath

    Monday, December 21 2009, 8:18PM

    “Migrant Worker's post is very important - it appears that the accident-waiting-to-happen on Dorchester St has already happened.

    Here is a junction where all the new visitors to Bath will arrive, to be faced with pedestrian crossings that don't follow the national norm of a green man on the opposite side of the road. How on earth are they supposed to known the green man doesn't apply to their crossing? Why should they assume that they need to look at the low-down one on their own side of the road, which is easily obscured by waiting pedestrians? It certainly caught me out the first time I used it.

    As an engineer myself I'm frankly astounded that the inherent flaws weren't uncovered or corrected prior to implementation. What kind of risk assessment was conducted that managed to overlook this?

    I'm no conspiracy theorist but I really find it hard to believe that in this day and age, something this dangerous could be pushed through without certain details being suppressed. IMHO, it should be closed immediately.”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by Vanessa, Lower Weston

    Saturday, December 19 2009, 1:05PM

    “Response2Route are in the process of putting together evidence for the Inquiry.
    If you feel that you may be able to help in any way or if you objected to the CPOs and plan on attending the Public Inquiry please head on over to www.response2route.co.uk
    and get in touch so we can help each other.
    Thank you.”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by donut, Weston

    Friday, December 18 2009, 7:36PM

    “Mike Wherever

    It happened everywhere. There was supposed to be healthy competition between providers but rich companies like Stagecoach were able to sustain losses while they bankrupted smaller companies knowing they could recoup their profits when they had a monopoly.

    In Bath other companies only get routes that First don't want.

    If you read the ThisisBristol forum, a common feature on transport questions is "Get rid of First".”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by Mike, Bath today - gone tomorrow

    Friday, December 18 2009, 4:26PM

    “Up to around 1981, I lived near Leeds and public transport was pretty impressive, with relatively low prices and a good chance that one's bus would turn up on time.
    In those days, the services were run either by British Rail or by local corporations/councils. The rolling stock was usually old but well maintained, (and the buses had conductors - one of them being my uncle) a great bonus for any bus user.
    So, as bus travel after privatisation in West Yorkshire went to the dogs, did the same happen in Bath? Was it better before Thatcher got her hands on this vital part of most of our daily lives?
    I refer again to the idea of videoing of Dorchester Street, In another part of this 'paper there is mentioned a very excellent Facebook campaign to show support for Mr Flagg. Would it not benefit those of you who are regularly subjected to the misery of Dorchester Street to sit atop a double decker and collect video evidence to be included in a Facebook collection? I am sure that support would be collected by people travelling to Bath from all over the world.
    Just a question and a thought from a visitor to your otherwise lovely city.”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by JC, Bath

    Friday, December 18 2009, 4:06PM

    “Anil - There is also a lot worse than Bath around the UK, but lets not allow facts to get in the way of your anti-Bath comments.
    Bath may have inept planners, but it's such a great place to live. Let's hope we all get what we want in 2010, sensible planning for Bath, the busometer demolished, and a proper BTP that is cost-effective. And let's hope Anil has hassle-free travel, so that he finally sees the light and learns to love Bath. Seriously, have a great Christmas Anil, and looking forward to more bur-related banter next year!”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by donut, Weston

    Friday, December 18 2009, 10:42AM

    “"Has David Redgewell ever said anything useful."

    Who knows, as he doesn't seem to have any actual responsibility.

    He seems to be full-time campaigner - Transport 2000, Railfuture, Campaign for Better Transport, South West Transport Network.

    He views the Bath BRT as a vital part of the Greater Bristol Metro.”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by PJ, Batheaston

    Friday, December 18 2009, 10:28AM

    “John, Widcombe - if you can't back up your comments, don't waste your time by posting them in the first place.”

  • Profile image for This is Bath

    by Dave, Weston

    Friday, December 18 2009, 10:15AM

    “Has David Redgewell ever said anything useful. If he wants to help solve congestion he can get a campaign going to force down bus fares and stop First ripping people off and acting to limit public transport availability. If having got fares to a level where they attract people off the roads we still need to think about new bus routes then people might have more sympathy with schemes, but the scheme as a proposed is a massive white elephant which will do little to improve congestion.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters